Evidence Hub

Efficacy of Chinese herbal medicine on poststroke depression in animal models: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Li Li, Bixiu Huo, Yuan Wang, Yao Wang, Ying Gong, Yun Zhang, Ting-Ting Liu, G. Sha et al.

Frontiers in Neurology, 2023

9 citations

Abstract

Background Poststroke depression (PSD) is a common complication that can seriously affect patients' functional recovery and quality of life after a stroke. Various side effects have been found to be associated with the pharmacological therapies used for PSD. Studies have shown that Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) can effectively improve PSD-like behavior and neurological function in clinical and animal studies. The efficacy of CHM on PSD in animal models has not been systematically analyzed. Methods The following electronic databases were searched for articles published up to September 2022: PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Embase. Studies that reported the efficacy of CHM in animals with PSD and were written in English were included. Depression-like behavior and the neurological deficit score were assessed as measures of efficacy. The included studies assessed depression-like behavior using sucrose preference, open-field, forced swimming, and tail suspension tests, as well as body weight. The Review Manager version 5.4 and STATA version 13.1 software packages were used for the meta-analysis. The standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals was used to assess all the outcomes. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity. The Egger's test and funnel plots were used to assess the potential publication bias. Sensitivity analyses were used to identify the stability of the results. Results A total of 14 studies,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free