Evidence Hub

Creation and characterization of normal myocardial perfusion imaging databases using the IQ·SPECT system

Okuda K, Nakajima K, Matsuo S, Kondo C, Sarai M, Horiguchi Y, Konishi T, Onoguchi M et al.

Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2018

159 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Image acquisition by short-time single-photon emission-computed tomography (SPECT) has been made feasible by IQ·SPECT. The aim of this study was to generate normal databases (NDBs) of thallium-201 (201Tl) myocardial perfusion imaging for IQ·SPECT, and characterize myocardial perfusion distribution.

METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively enrolled 159 patients with a low likelihood of cardiac diseases from four hospitals in Japan. All patients underwent short-time 201Tl myocardial perfusion IQ·SPECT with or without attenuation and scatter correction (ACSC) in either supine or prone position. The mean myocardial counts were calculated using 17-segment polar maps. Three NDBs were derived from supine and prone images as well as supine images with ACSC. Differences between the supine and prone positions were observed in the uncorrected sex-segregated NDBs in the mid-inferolateral counts (p ≤ 0.016 for males and p ≤ 0.002 for females). Differences between IQ·SPECT and conventional SPECT were also observed in the mid-anterior, inferolateral, and apical lateral counts (p ≤ 0.009 for males and p ≤ 0.003 for females). Apical low counts attributed to myocardial thinning were observed in the apical anterior and apex segments in the supine IQ·SPECT NDB with ACSC.

CONCLUSIONS: There were significant differences between uncorrected supine and prone NDBs, between uncorrected supine NDB and supine NDB with ACSC, and between uncorrected supine NDB and conventional SPECT NDB.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 159 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free