Evidence Hub

Deep Learning-based Post Hoc CT Denoising for the Coronary Perivascular Fat Attenuation Index

Nishii T, Kobayashi T, Saito T, Kotoku A, Ohta Y, Kitahara S, Umehara K, Ota J et al.

Academic radiology, 2023

43 participants

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Coronary inflammation related to high-risk hemorrhagic plaques can be captured by the perivascular fat attenuation index (FAI) using coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Since the FAI is susceptible to image noise, we believe deep learning (DL)-based post hoc noise reduction can improve diagnostic capability. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of the FAI in DL-based denoised high-fidelity CCTA images compared with coronary plaque magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) delivered high-intensity hemorrhagic plaques (HIPs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 43 patients who underwent CCTA and coronary plaque MRI. We generated high-fidelity CCTA images by denoising the standard CCTA images using a residual dense network that supervised the denoising task by averaging three cardiac phases with nonrigid registration. We measured the FAIs as the mean CT value of all voxels (range of -190 to -30 HU) located within a radial distance from the outer proximal right coronary artery wall. The diagnostic reference standard was defined as HIPs (high-risk hemorrhagic plaques) using MRI. The diagnostic performance of the FAI in the original and denoised images was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS: Of 43 patients, 13 had HIPs. The denoised CCTA improved the area under the curve (0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-0.99]) of the FAI compared with that in the original image (0.77 [95% CI, 0.62-0.91], p…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 43 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free