Evidence Hub

Virtual brain and electroencephalography explain the variance of memory alterations in mild cognitive impairment

Monteverdi A, Cotta Ramusino M, Conca F, Augello A, Totaro C, Grasso PA, Castelnovo A, Lorenzi RM et al.

Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2026

30 participants

Abstract

Background: Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is a heterogeneous clinical condition characterized by a wide spectrum of cognitive and behavioural manifestations. Despite numerous studies, the link between neuropsychological performance and pathophysiological signatures of the disease-including Aβ and tau accumulation along with altered excitation/inhibition (E/I) balance and brain rhythms-remains elusive.

Methods: Here Aβ/tau biomarkers were used to distinguish positive (MCI+- prodromal Alzheimer's disease) and negative (MCI-) subjects in a cohort of 30 MCI patients (18 MCI+ and 12 MCI-). Virtual brain models based on high-field magnetic resonance imaging data were then developed to determine the inter-node coupling and E/I profile in resting-state networks, while node spectral information was obtained from source analysis of high-density electroencephalography (HD-EEG). Finally, virtual brains and HD-EEG parameters, creating brain digital twins of individual subjects, were correlated with cognitive performance.

Results: While virtual brain simulations did not reveal E/I differences between MCI+ and MCI-, a positive correlation emerged between synaptic parameters of the limbic network and verbal episodic memory for both groups. EEG power spectral density revealed a lower high-frequency/low-frequency ratio in MCI+ largely due to a reduced alpha band in the default mode, limbic, attention, frontoparietal, visual and somatomotor networks. A strong correlation emerged between…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 30 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free